Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs is a ‘swinger', not a rapist.
Marc Agnifilo argues this claim as the rapper rejects the plea deal before the trial.
In a courtroom already exemplified with anticipation, Thursday’s pre-trial hearing for Sean “Diddy” Combs delivered a legal spectacle that veered between salacious and significant. With the never-ending accusations of sex trafficking and racketeering looming, federal prosecutors and Diddy's defense team clashed over what evidence should reach the jury. Both sides staking out significant territory ahead of the May 5 trial.
During the hearing, Combs, 55, remained focused and attentive, fully aware of the gravity of the proceedings. He leaned in to whisper and exchange notes with his legal team. Clearly demonstrating his commitment to the case at hand. A warm smile broke across his face when he spotted Justin in the wood-paneled courtroom. Providing a moment of familial connection amid the palpable tension.
Dressed in khaki jail attire and wearing laceless Vans slip-on shoes, the hip-hop artist conveyed a potent mix of resilience and vulnerability. Before the proceedings began, he shared firm embraces with his three female attorneys, followed by a strong handshake with one of his male lawyers, underscoring the solidarity of his defense team. Throughout the hearing, he remained engaged, occasionally taking a sip from a small plastic cup of water that sat on the defense table, a subtle reminder of the significant weight of the hour.
Here’s a breakdown of the most jaw-dropping revelations and legal maneuvers that came out of the Manhattan courtroom — a day that had it all: swingers, surveillance footage, psychological experts, and a plea offer.
Yes, They Said “Swingers” in Court
In a moment that immediately sparked headlines, Diddy’s lead defense attorney, Marc Agnifilo, responded to prosecutors’ attempts to block evidence of other couples hiring escorts by exclaiming: “They are swingers!” The courtroom reaction was reportedly stunned silence.
His attorneys told the court that the rap mogul thought it was "appropriate" to have multiple sex partners, including sex workers, because it is "common".
“There's a lifestyle, call it swingers or whatever you will, that he thought was appropriate because it was common," Mr Combs' lawyer Marc Agnifilo argued at the Manhattan courthouse on Friday.
The defense aims to contextualize Diddy's lifestyle — including the infamous "Freak Off" or “Wild King nights!” gatherings, as Diddy called them— as part of a consensual subculture involving adult parties and escorts. Not criminal activity.
How dare they?!
Whether the judge will allow this argument to be formally presented remains undecided, but it signals a provocative strategy headed toward undermining the prosecution’s claims of coercion and exploitation.
A Plea Deal Was Offered — And Rejected
In a significant development, the government revealed that a plea offer had been made to Combs — and turned down. While the terms of the deal were not disclosed, Judge Arun Subramanian confirmed that a formal allocution (official declaration) regarding the offer is scheduled for May 1.
This signals that despite the intensity of the evidence and charges, Combs and his team are betting on a trial — and on a jury that might believe his version of events.
Turning down a plea deal and taking your chances with a jury…. BOLD move. I didn't expect him to plea out anyway.
Surveillance Video Gets the Green Light (Sort Of)
The judge ruled that the now-infamous video — captured on a cellphone filming a hotel hallway surveillance monitor — will be admissible at trial. The footage, reportedly showing Combs assaulting his then-girlfriend Cassie Ventura in 2016, won’t be shown in its broadcast form (as seen on CNN) but rather as the raw, cellphone-recorded version.
The person who recorded the video on an older model iPhone is expected to testify at trial, according to prosecutors. Diddy’s team attempted to block the footage, arguing it was distorted and prejudicial, but the court ruled its evidentiary value outweighs any potential harm.
I was unaware that there was even cell phone footage from a bystander!
Cassie is expected to testify at the trial under her own name.
The Battle of the Experts: Hughes vs. Barty
Psychologist Dr. Dawn Hughes — known from the Johnny Depp-Amber Heard and Harvey Weinstein trials — will testify for the prosecution as an expert on psychological manipulation and coercive behavior. However, Judge Subramanian barred her from using the term "coercive control," ruling that it's a legal term not applicable in expert testimony.
Coercive control encompasses a series of actions, including assault, threats, humiliation, and intimidation, designed to harm, punish, or instill fear in the victim. This pattern of coercive and controlling behavior lies at the core of domestic abuse. Recognizing and confronting these tactics is essential as they represent serious violations of rights and dignity.
Diddy’s proposed rebuttal witness, Dr. Sasha Barty, was similarly restricted. Barty will be allowed to testify about individual trauma responses and coping mechanisms — but not about victims inventing memories for lawsuits, a line the judge called off-limits.
“Inventing memories for lawsuits” this stood out to me. As there are many, many, Jane and John Doe jumping onto lawsuits whose stories don't exactly line up with the REAL victim’s story.
It feels as if something more sinister is at bay.
Take a took at the Ashley Parham lawsuit. That was later amended to include several other celebrities, including Jaguar Wright and Odell Beckham Jr.
Ashley's story is a devastating series of unfortunate events. These Randoms, mother and son, say they were there and saw everything that happened to Ashley. Yet she never saw them.
Too many amended lawsuits with bullshit accusations that discredit the real victim's story.
In the end Ashley's bravery to continue to call Diddy out ending up costing her. Ashley was the women who Diddy retaliated against because she said he had something to do with Tupac's murder.
A Medical Procedure and the “Secret Motion”
In a hushed moment, the court discussed a sealed motion relating to a “particular medical procedure.” While the details are officially off the record, speculation swirls that it may involve breast augmentation tied to one of the alleged victims. The government claims the procedure supports their argument of coercion, while Diddy’s team wanted it excluded.
The judge issued a compromise: the procedure can only be mentioned in testimony if prosecutors first seek permission at sidebar.
Lots of speculation is involving some kind of body augmentation.
It could be an abortion. Some say it could be the IUD Kristina tried to give Ashley. I feel it's too early for her. Her lawsuit will be handled later as it came in after Cassie andDawn's.
A sealed motion is a confidential legal document submitted to the court, kept under wraps to safeguard sensitive information, privacy, or ongoing investigations.
In an intriguing twist, prosecutors have uncovered four additional accusers who are poised to take the stand as victims in the upcoming trial. Adding another layer to the proceedings, the judge has permitted the testimony of a "propensity witness"—an unnamed former romantic partner—who will recount alleged past abuses by name, even though they are not directly involved in the criminal charges.
The 911 Call & the Ghost of Kid Cudi’s Car
One piece of evidence stirring online speculation is a 911 call that may relate to the alleged bombing of Kid Cudi’s car — an incident referenced in civil claims. The judge ruled the call is only admissible under limited conditions: it must serve as a “prior consistent statement” to support a trial witness’s testimony. Otherwise, it stays out.
What had happened was….
The Los Angeles City Fire Department confirmed that Kid Cudi’s car, a Porsche, was set on fire using an “incendiary device” on January 9, 2012. The incident, reported at 10:53 a.m., caused estimated damages of $10,000 and was classified as “intentional.” No suspects were named, and a 2012 fire department official noted the vehicle was not fully engulfed when they arrived.
The alleged arson was mentioned in Cassie Ventura's lawsuit against Sean Combs, in which she claimed Combs threatened to blow up Cudi’s car during their brief relationship. Cudi corroborated Ventura's account, stating, “This is all true. My car indeed exploded.” Combs’ lawyer, Marc Agnifilo, emphasized that there is no evidence linking Combs to the incident, asserting he had no involvement.
Well no shit. HE (Diddy) probably didn't do it. But no doubts in my mind he didn't order it to be done.
Will the Public See the “Freak Off” Videos?
Perhaps the biggest unresolved question: will the public ever see the so-called “Freak Off” tapes?
Prosecutors want the videos — allegedly depicting Diddy at private sex parties — admitted under seal to avoid public distribution. The judge showed interest in the constitutional implications of sealing such material, citing the public’s right to open trials. No ruling yet, but the government must submit the tapes to the court by May 9 for further consideration.
Prosecutors said they'd file a letter providing examples where similar procedures were followed in other cases. In R. Kelly's trial in Brooklyn, the court had jurors watch videos of sexual abuse on small screens in front of their jury seats while wearing earphones, while journalists and members of the public were kept out of the courtroom.
That's something I could see happening in this case. Personally, I don't wanna see anything that shows another human being getting harmed. I'm OK with seeing this person or that person on the tape. But watching them drug and abuse women…? I'm good.
Victim Identities and Anonymous Testimony
Judge Subramanian reaffirmed that several victims, including “Victim 4,” will be allowed to testify under pseudonyms. Victim 4 is described as a longtime employee of Combs, and even if her identity has become partially public, the court ruled anonymity will remain to protect her safety.
But through digging and putting 2 and 2 together. I believe Victim 4 is Dawn Richard.
There she is showing the Illuminati that she's down.
Richard claims that Combs was abusive throughout the eight years they worked together, which spanned her time in Danity Kane and later as a member of his music trio Diddy-Dirty Money. The lawsuit accuses him of groping her, threatening her, and subjecting her to “inhumane working conditions.” Richard also claims to have witnessed Combs get physically violent with other women, including his former partners, Ventura and Kim Porter.
Family support
Justin Dior Combs made a calculated appearance at his father’s pretrial hearing Friday, sitting silently in the courtroom as prosecutors laid out disturbing details of alleged sex trafficking, coercion, and incriminating video evidence. His presence—upbeat, watchful, and undeniably public—felt less like quiet support and more like a subtle message: the Combs name isn’t retreating. Whether it was an act of loyalty or legal theater, Justin’s front-row seat to his father’s unraveling legal storm didn’t go unnoticed by me. Nor did his Harley Davidson jacket.
What’s Next
As of now, jury selection is still set to begin on May 5, with opening arguments tentatively scheduled for May 12. The trial promises to be one of the most watched — and most controversial — celebrity criminal proceedings in recent memory. Bigger than OJ, some even say. Between the high-profile witnesses, potentially explosive video evidence, and the defense's eyebrow-raising strategy, the world will be watching closely as the next chapter unfolds.
The trial is set to feature a diverse array of witnesses, including sex workers who were called in for the controversial "freak offs," revealing a complex web of allegations and testimonies that promise to keep the courtroom on edge.
Keep it here for all things Diddy! And follow me on Instagram: Aliceredpill12