BREAKING: One of Diddy’s Key Accusers Is MISSING!
When the truth doesn’t show up to court, ask who made it disappear.
We’ve got a situation.
Mike’s in the group chat with red string and a corkboard like he’s about to reopen the case of THE NOTE.
Not the trial. The note.
But this one’s real and it’s getting worse by the hour.
One of the prosecution’s key witnesses in the federal sex trafficking and racketeering trial against Sean “Diddy” Combs has gone missing. Victim 3, as she’s been labeled in court filings, was expected to testify under her real name. Her story was described as personal and essential.
But now?
Poof. Gone.
Prosecutors say they can’t get in touch with her. The lawyer representing her is reportedly “dealing with personal issues.”
Excuse me? Personal issues? Now?
This isn’t some minor deposition. This is a high-stakes federal trial against one of the most powerful figures in music. Possibly the most important sex trafficking trial of the decade. And a key witness, whose testimony could devastate the defense, has just gone dark. And her lawyer can’t participate either? No explanation, no clarity, just vague mentions of personal complications?
Something’s off.
VICTIM 3
Victim 3 Is Missing. If you’ve been following along, you already know I’ve speculated that Victim 3 might be Anna Kane, the ex-wife of NHL star Evander Kane. She’s one of the few women who’s gone public, accusing Diddy of raping her when she was just 17. After being drugged and trafficked alongside another girl. She filed her civil suit under her real name. She said she wasn’t afraid.
But it’s possible I was wrong. The timeline doesn’t perfectly match. The testimony in court filings doesn’t fully align with hers. So either Victim 3 isn’t Anna Kane… or something changed.
***Editor’s Note:
I want to take a moment to clarify that while I previously speculated Victim 3 could be Anna Kane based on public court filings, timelines, and her own civil case. It’s now clear the match isn’t clean. I may have been wrong. And in a case like this, with lives on the line and stories that carry weight, I think it’s important to say that out loud.***
And now, with trial underway, we’ve learned that Victim 3 isn’t coming. Prosecutors revealed this week that they’ve lost contact with her and her lawyer. The official reason? “Personal issues.” No further detail. No protective order. No clear sign of whether she dropped out or was pulled out. Just a sudden and unexplained silence at the worst possible time.
Victim 3 was expected to deliver some of the most damning testimony in the case. Allegations of being drugged, trafficked, and raped while Combs watched and recorded. Her story echoed the broader pattern of coercion and surveillance that the government says underpins Diddy’s alleged criminal enterprise. She was going to connect the dots. Her testimony could have tipped the scales.
And now she’s gone.
The prosecution is pressing forward without her. They still have Cassie Ventura. They still have Victims 1, 2, and 4. Each with stories of abuse, humiliation, and control. A fifth woman will also be permitted to testify under Rule 404(b), even though she isn’t tied to specific charges. But make no mistake: Victim 3 was supposed to be a keystone. Her absence shakes the foundation.
Whether she was intimidated, traumatized, or simply unable to go through with it. We may never know. But her silence says as much about the system as her words ever could.
What Happened to Her?
Was she intimidated?
Paid off?
Scared out of her skin?
Is she curled up on a friend’s couch, sobbing with her phone turned off?
Or is she in an undisclosed location with a new phone, a new story, and a lawyer we’ll never meet?
Because whoever she is and whatever her story was supposed to be, she mattered.
She was the government’s pressure point. She was the narrative anchor. The girl in the room no one could explain away.
Maybe that’s why she had to disappear.
Prosecutors told the court they’ve lost contact with her and with her attorney, who has withdrawn from communication entirely, citing only “personal issues.” That’s it. No motion to withdraw. No sealed filings. No alternate counsel stepping in. Just radio silence from someone who was supposed to walk into federal court and deliver one of the most devastating testimonies in the case.
This wasn’t some fringe witness brought in to fill out a narrative. Victim 3 was central. She was listed in filings. Her claims about being drugged, raped, trafficked, filmed, and passed around, weren’t just horrific, they were specific. Her story mirrored others and helped shape the government’s entire theory: that Diddy ran a criminal enterprise built on fear, coercion, and blackmail.
The court didn’t say her name. The prosecution didn’t elaborate. But make no mistake this disappearance matters. It shifts the weight of the case. It forces the jury to hear about a woman they’ll never see. It gives the defense room to argue doubt, distance, and unreliability.
Whether she was pulled out, threatened, bought out, or broken down. We may never know.
But her silence will echo throughout this trial louder than any testimony.
Her absence doesn’t just leave a gap in the prosecution’s case. It creates the perfect vacuum for spin, distortion, and distraction to rush in.
The Media Misdirection
Meanwhile, the media keeps shoving Cassie into every headline like she’s the main event. And don’t get me wrong. Cassie’s story matters. But she settled her civil case. She’s not testifying here. This federal case isn’t about tabloid optics, it’s about pattern, method, control.
And when your best pattern witness disappears right before trial, that’s not a coincidence. That’s a rupture.
And what’s worse? No one’s talking about it.
Not the networks.
Not the morning shows.
Not the justice influencers or legal commentators.
Just silence. The kind that’s always strategic.
Opening statements begin Monday. I won’t be in the room. But I’ll be updating you every moment.
The courtroom is where it plays out.
Make sure you're following me on Instagram for live updates while the trial is going on.
Look out for my new podcast series hosted by me, Alice Redpill, alongside my co-host Alexis, a lawyer with a sharp eye on this case. We’re breaking it all down: legally, emotionally, and unapologetically.
Alice Uncoded: Combs Confidential is where we decode it.
Just pondering: i stumbled onto Anna’s insta a while back. Felt bad for her situation (something about powerful narcissistic people pulling power plays really ticks me off) so decided to follow her. She was posting on her stories pretty frequently. Now not much activity on her account since the trial started. I know she is in a custody battle
Perhaps, if she by chance was/is victim 3 and they are citing ‘personal reasons’ i could see why she would choose to back down from this. The two cases at the same time would not only be pressing but could potentially damage her custody case
If she isnt victim 3, i 100% think they were paid off